A Cloudflare engineer, Dillon Mulroy, is recommending that users deploy AI agents to daily mute and block accounts he describes as producing low-quality AI-generated content, which he calls "AI slop."
AI agents · Feed management
A Cloudflare engineer urges users to let AI agents mute and block "AI slop" accounts daily
Dillon Mulroy shares a personal list of about 780 accounts he calls "AI slop posters" and suggests giving an agent the list so it can act on all of them every day. It is an individual recommendation, not a Cloudflare product or official initiative.
~780
accounts on one personal blocklist
Daily
mute and block runs suggested for every listed account
0
official company statements included in the reporting
Scale of the list
Each block = 100 accounts. The list is about 7.8 blocks tall.
7 full blocks + 0.8 block = about 780 accounts that would be muted and blocked every day under the suggested approach.
The faded top segment shows the partial block, so the column height stays proportional to the count.
How the suggested loop works
Build a personal list
→
Give an agent access
→
Mute and block all daily
→
Cleaner feed, no manual work
The loop repeats each day, so the feed stays filtered without the user clearing accounts by hand.
The case for it
Crowded feeds of automated posts, images, and replies can be cleared out automatically.
Routine moderation is delegated to an agent instead of manual blocking.
It applies autonomous AI tools to a user's own feed rather than waiting for platform-wide filters.
The concerns
The "slop" label is subjective, and no verification method is described.
Legitimate accounts could be blocked along with low-quality ones.
No official Cloudflare position or company statement is included.
The open question
Can an agent reliably tell low-quality AI output from legitimate posts?
Whether personal blocklists become mainstream depends on the tools platforms provide for managing automated content.
Accuracy in separating AI slop from legitimate posts will determine whether the approach is safe to rely on.
Users weighing this approach must balance the risk of blocking legitimate accounts against a cleaner feed.
Continue reading The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in ✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.Unlocking the full article...