AI companies are embedding third-party safety evaluators inside their labs—but the arrangement may be hollow if those evaluators lack real access to the information they need, according to Apollo Research. Marius Hobbhahn, CEO of the AI safety firm, argues that embedding evaluators in name only, without what he calls "employee-equivalent access" to training processes, intermediate model checkpoints, and internal reasoning traces, leaves frontier AI risks undetected. The distinction matters: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei recently proposed that all frontier AI developers should embed independent evaluators, hailing it as an industry-changing commitment to outside oversight. But Apollo's work reveals the gap between the promise and the practice.
Continue reading
The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.
Already purchased? Sign in✓ Signed in — this article isn’t included in your current plan.
Unlocking the full article...
Contact us
Questions, corrections, or ideas? Send us a message here. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.
Thank you. Your message has been sent. We aim to reply by email within 24 hours.Please enter your email address and a message.We could not send your message. Please try again in a little while.