ainewsblitz.com

Breaking

Liability, Not Regulation, Drives AI Safety, WSJ Columnist Argues

  • Policy & Regulation
  • Foundation Models

Wall Street Journal opinion columnist Andy Kessler argues that legal liability, rather than government regulation, is the true force compelling AI companies to build safer systems—and that OpenAI and Anthropic's recent public warnings about AI dangers reflect less principled concern than financial self-interest. In a September 27 opinion piece titled "The Real AI Fear: Lawyers," Kessler contends that "liability is much more effective than regulation at pushing companies to be safe." The commentary arrives as OpenAI and Anthropic, facing mounting internal safety incidents and regulatory pressure ahead of anticipated public offerings, have intensified calls for government oversight and third-party auditing of their most advanced models.

Continue reading

The rest of this article is for AI News Blitz readers. Choose an option below to keep reading.

$20
Read this article
$29/month
Unlimited — all 27,133 articles, the full archive, and comprehension quizzes
Save 72%
$98/year
≈ $8.17/month
Unlimited, billed once a year